Welcome to Soldier of Fortune Community Forums
01 Aug 2021, 19:33


View unanswered postsView active topics



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
EF Stole the last SFL Season - EF & Staff Corruption in SFL 

Should the title be taken from EF and be given to VM ?
Poll ended at 12 Jun 2016, 15:48
Yes, VM is the winner of the last SFL Season 67%  67%  Fossil [ 2 ]
No, EF is the winner of the last SFL Season 33%  33%  Persian [ 1 ]
Total votes : 3

EF Stole the last SFL Season - EF & Staff Corruption in SFL 
Author Message
Great Britain

User avatar

Joined:
Mon Nov 21st, 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3086
Last post of the previous page :
That rule was for clans using a banned player, there was no rule for scummy players sneaking into teams incognito.
Extenuating circumstances had to be taken into consideration.


01 Jun 2016, 18:26
Profile WWW
Netherlands

User avatar

Topic author
Joined:
Wed Nov 23rd, 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 4064

Evilan
evilan
The rule says a clan is not allowed to use a banned player. Every action that results into using a banned player in a match is not allowed because of that rule. This includes a player sneaking into a clan. There is no exception in that rule written. In fact, the rule speaks out against "exceptions" like circumstances because the word "always" appears in the rule.

Quote:
4) Players & Clan Rules
- Using a player that is banned or listed in another clan will always result in 3 points reduction, even if
the clan has lost the match.


What gives you the right to suddenly invent new exceptions to the rules and implement it on matches that are already played ? It's corruption and manipulation.


01 Jun 2016, 19:09
Profile
Great Britain

User avatar

Joined:
Mon Nov 21st, 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3086
Rules cannot be written  to cover all eventualities. Extenuating circumstances came into play.


01 Jun 2016, 19:29
Profile WWW
Netherlands

User avatar

Topic author
Joined:
Wed Nov 23rd, 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 4064

Evilan
evilan
ShocK wrote:
Rules cannot be written  to cover all eventualities. Extenuating circumstances came into play.


Well this one is written to cover everything. Only in your head is not.


02 Jun 2016, 01:15
Profile
Great Britain

User avatar

Joined:
Mon Nov 21st, 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3086
We're going around in circles here and the decision was made ages ago. Any further questions should be put to your clanleader and posted in the clanleader forum.
Closed.


02 Jun 2016, 06:45
Profile WWW
Netherlands

User avatar

Joined:
Sat Nov 26th, 2011
Posts: 3158
Evil4N wrote:
Nijogeth wrote:
Good luck. Your own rule also was that a game that is played will always be counted.

Nonetheless, the rule is used correct. Teams will always get a 3 point deduction for using a banned player. The match will still be valid though as nobody of VM ever said anything before or during the match. So the points will be deducted from EF, but the match will not be a default, as the rules that you also made does not cover for that.

So we did follow the rules.


No you didn't. If the match would count, then VM gets 2 points and EF gets 2 points. Because both VM and EF has win 1 map in that match. EF gets minus 3 points because they used a banned player, because the rules says so. Which means both clans has 9 points in the final standings = final match need to take place.

Also since when does SFL-Staff need clans to tell them to follow their own rules ? Don't shift your responsibility as staff towards the clans.

Nijogeth wrote:
Good luck. Your own rule also was that a game that is played will always be counted.

No that's not a rule in the SFL-rules. Stop talking fantasies.


You Sir cannot count. EF won 7 maps and lost 1 (which is the 1 with the banned player playing). They would have 11 points with the 3 deducted (14-3=11). VM won 4, had 1 draw and 3 losses, which gives them 9 points.

Edit: But if those maps are defaulted (the way it is counted in the final standings) it gives EF 14-2 (seeing the 3 point penalty is not applied as it was not an official match that Adem played in), which is 12 and VM will have 11 points. It does not change anything.


02 Jun 2016, 12:17
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Topic Views: 7331


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


Top
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
www.sof1.org